In the second session, "Blind Spots in Metacognition," we will discuss Dunning and Kruger's experiments as a starting point.don't know what you don't know We followed studies that measured the construct. This time we'll go beyond that -- why don't we try to see the boundaries of our own knowledge? Experimental data in psychology can measure what you can't see, but another intellectual tradition holds the answer to why you don't see it.Sigmund Freud (1856–1939)'s psychoanalysis, his daughter anna freud (1895–1982), a defense mechanism systematized by Harvard University. George Vaillant (1934–2022) demonstrated the maturity of defense through a 75-year longitudinal study, and Melanie Klein's (1882–1960) object relations theory -- these five perspectives show:Overconfidence is not a phenomenon that occurs on the surface of consciousness, but an unconscious function to protect the ego. This is the structure. This time, we will look for the roots of overconfidence deep within our hearts.

01Why read Freud to talk about overconfidence?

Modern empirical studies such as Kahneman, Moore and Healy, and Tetlock have shown that “What is overconfidence?” “When does it occur?” “How widespread is it?” There were three questions. Quantitative data can answer these questions. However, another question remains... “Why don’t we see the bias in our own judgment?”. This question cannot be answered by simply observing behavior. We need an intellectual tradition that deals with what is happening beneath consciousness.

Freud's psychoanalysis is the foundational theory of 20th century psychology, and it has also been one of the most heavily criticized. Some of his clinical hypotheses have not been supported by modern empirical research and have undergone many revisions. but,"The majority of human decisions are made outside of consciousness." This fundamental proposition is a strong discovery that has been independently reconfirmed by modern cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and social psychology. Kahneman's dual-process theory (System 1 / System 2), Wegner's illusion of conscious will (1999), Bargh's automaticity studies (1994) -- all point to the same place in different words.

“The ego is not the master of its own house (Das Ich ist nicht Herr in seinem eigenen Haus)” - Sigmund Freud, Introduction to Psychoanalysis (1916–17), Lecture 18

フロイトのこの一句は、過信に気づくシリーズの理論的核心と直結します。The subject of judgment is not consciousness, but the unconscious structure that operates underneath it.. That's why even if you consciously decide to be careful, overconfidence itself won't decrease. The phenomenon that ``knowledge does not eliminate overconfidence'' that Kahneman warned about in ``Thinking, Fast and Slow'' is a natural consequence of rereading Freud's proposition. This episode summons Freud because of overconfidence. root There is nothing else to do.

02Consciousness, preconsciousness, and unconsciousness -- topographical map of the mind

Freud's first model of the mind wastopographical model It is called. This schema, codified in Die Traumdeutung (Die Traumdeutung) in 1900, distinguished the mind into three layers.

layer 1

Consciousness (Bewusstsein)

What I am aware of now. Now you're reading a text, feeling the chair, making a decision -- all areas that are in the focus of your attention. However, the amount that can be held momentarily is extremely limited.

layer 2

Preconsciousness (Vorbewusste)

Although it is not consciously conscious, it can be retrieved if you call it out intentionally. Memories of yesterday's lunch, the names of familiar colleagues, and past decisions. The area of the "storehouse of memory" that can be accessed by paying attention.

layer 3

Unconscious (Unbewusste)

An area that cannot be called upon consciously, but continues to influence judgment and behavior. Repressed impulses, unacknowledged motives, memories that threaten the ego. This is the widest area of the mind.

Freud's most shocking proposition was thatConsciousness is only the tip of the iceberg, and most decisions are the result of emerging from the unconscious. That's what it means. The implications for materials examiners are profound - being able to consciously explain, ``I made this judgment on these grounds'' may only be a small part of the judgment.The real motive lies elsewhere, and the motive is not visible to the person.

What is important in the context of understanding overconfidence is thatThe unconscious mind is not a passive storehouse, but actively controls the conscious mind. That's the point. Information that causes pain or fear is "pushed back" from consciousness by the unconscious. This is the premise for the defense mechanism we will discuss next.

03Id, ego, superego ── Structure theory of mind

In 1923, Freud supplemented the local theory. structural model will be published in ``Das Ich und das Es''. heart 三つの審級 This is his most influential diagram, divided into three parts.

Jury level 1

Ido (Es)

A storehouse of instinctive impulses. Follows the pleasure principle and seeks immediate gratification. They don't know logic, time, or morality. The source of life's fundamental energy.

Jury level 2

Ego (Ich)

A regulator that follows the reality principle. Negotiating between three pressures: id impulses, superego prohibitions, and external reality. The center of consciousness and the subject of judgment and execution.

Trial grade 3

Superego (Über-Ich)

Internalized social norms. The voices of "what should be" taken in from parents, teachers, and society. The source of conscience and ideals. It continues to issue commands and prohibitions to the ego.

The key to structural theory isThe ego is the most contradictory judge with pressure from three directions. That's what it means. The id demands ``satisfy your urges,'' the superego commands ``forbidden,'' and the reality of the outside world pressures you to ``adapt.'' The ego is constantly making decisions between these three in a state of tension.

The decisive proposition for understanding overconfidence appears here. The ego uses unconscious strategies to withstand this tension.. If the tension is too strong, the ego will be destroyed (manifested as neurosis/psychosis). Therefore, the ego has a device for alleviating tension. The device will be dealt with in the next section. defense mechanism is.Overconfidence is one of the ego's unconscious strategies to protect itself from three-way pressure. ──This is the central proposition of this issue.

04What is a defense mechanism? - Systematized by Anna Freud

It was her daughter who systematically organized the defense mechanisms that her father Freud had outlined. anna freud is. His 1936 book Das Ich und die Abwehrmechanismen (Das Ich und die Abwehrmechanismen) remains a standard reference work in modern psychiatry and clinical psychology.

"Defense mechanisms are unconscious operations used by the ego to protect itself from anxiety and pain. They do not appear only in pathological conditions, but are part of the daily functioning of healthy people. The difference lies in which mechanisms are used and with what intensity." - Anna Freud, The Ego and Defense Mechanisms (1936), Purpose from the Preface

Three propositions presented by Anna Freud are the key to understanding this episode.

Proposition 1

defense is unconscious

The person does not realize that ``I am denying this fact in order to protect myself.'' The moment you become conscious, that defense stops working.

Proposition 2

defense is universal

Everyone uses defense mechanisms on a daily basis. Whether something is pathological or not is a matter of quantity and robustness, not of kind. "It's the weak who use defense" is a misconception.

Proposition 3

Defense is also adaptive

Not all defense is bad. In the short term, it plays a role in protecting the ego and maintaining function. The problem is that it distorts our perception of reality over time.

Implications directly related to the overconfidence argument are propositions 1 and 3.The reason we don't recognize when we're overconfident is not a problem of intelligence or caution, but a function of a defense mechanism.. And since these defenses support ego stability in the short term, they cannot be easily let go. In order to reduce overconfidence, you first need to understand why it is so difficult to let go.

05Key Defense Mechanisms: Denial, Rationalization, Projection, Intellectualization, and Repression

アンナ・フロイトは 10 種類前後の防衛機制を整理しましたが、過信の議論に直接関わる五つを取り出します。それぞれが、自分の判断の偏りから自我を守るために働きます。

Mechanism 1

Denial

Not acknowledging the painful truth itself. ``There can't be any risk in this case'' ``There's no way my judgment is wrong'' -- the most primitive defenses that keep facts out of consciousness.

mechanism 2

Rationalization

Constructing plausible reasons after the fact that are not the real motive. ``That decision was unavoidable because I was in a hurry.'' ``It's not a problem because it's industry practice.'' - Logic used to protect past decisions.

mechanism 3

Projection

Experiencing elements that cannot be recognized within oneself as existing within another person. “That judge is too fixated on his own judgment.”—I feel the fixation within myself through others.

mechanism 4

Intellectualization

To distance yourself from emotional meaning and take refuge in abstract analysis. ``The risk of overconfidence'' point of issue ``I understand it as such''--but I do not arrive at an examination of my own judgment. Protect with theory.

mechanism 5

Repression

Pushing back into the unconscious what is painful when it reaches the conscious mind. Memories of past failures, slight doubts about judgment, and a sense of uncertainty -- on the surface it appears that you don't remember.

これら五つはいずれも、本人が "私はいま防衛機制を使っている" と意識することはありません。気づかないからこそ、機能する。Conscious defenses no longer function as defenses --This paradox is at the heart of the difficulty in dealing with overconfidence.

06防衛機制が過信を支える構造

前節の五つの機制が、どのように過信を維持するか。具体的な連鎖を見ます。Overconfidence is not an isolated phenomenon, but a state maintained by multiple defense mechanisms working together. This is a structural perspective.

A typical chain goes like this. First, we receive information from outside that contradicts our own judgment. Second, if you take that information seriously, it will hurt your ego, so first of all, denial and doubt the validity of the information ("the data is unreliable"). Thirdly, if there are parts that cannot be denied,rationalization is activated, and I construct an afterthought as to why my decision was correct (``I didn't have that information at the time''). Fourthly, the feeling of discomfort that still remains is projection forwarded to others by ("That person is too critical"). Fifth, the flight to more abstract discussions (intellectualization) or painful memories. suppression will be the last barrier.

“Overconfidence is a defense for the ego. result and not the cause. People who feel that they are right do not feel that way because they are truly right, but because they need to feel that way to protect their ego.'' - George Vaillant, The Wisdom of the Ego (1993) Purpose from Chapter 1

This proposition by Vaillant defines the structure of overconfidence in one line.Overconfidence is a "successful state" of the ego's defense mechanism.. When the ego is protected from threats, the result is a sense of ``I'm right.'' And that feeling is experienced as a fact for the person in question. So there is no doubt about it.

Implications guide techniques for dealing with overconfidence. Rather than attacking overconfidence itself directly, identify the defense mechanisms that operate underneath it one by one.. This is the basic theory of practice that will be covered in Parts 8 and 10 of this series.

07Vaillant's long-term demonstration ─ Maturity of defense mechanisms

Psychoanalytic theory has long been criticized for its lack of empirical evidence. The person who changed that situation was a psychiatrist at Harvard University. George Vaillant took over Harvard Study of Adult Development is. The longitudinal study, which began in 1939, followed 268 men for more than 75 years, making it one of the longest psychological studies in human history.

In Adaptation to Life (1977), Vaillant documented the lives of his subjects and analyzed the relationship between patterns of defense mechanism use and life outcomes: work, marriage, health, psychological maturity. His discoveries established a defense mechanism Maturity hierarchy It was to be positioned as

Tier 1

psychotic defenses

Denial, distortion, delusional projection. It greatly distorts the perception of reality. Although anyone can use it under temporary stress, chronic use is associated with psychotic states.

Tier 2

immature defense

Projection, daydreaming, acting out, passive aggression. It often appears during adolescence or under severe stress. Chronic use in adults is associated with interpersonal difficulties.

Tier 3

neurotic defense

Repression, displacement, reaction formation, intellectualization, rationalization. Although they function socially, they suffer from internal conflicts. Range used by the majority of adults on a daily basis.

Tier 4

mature defense

Humor, altruism, sublimation, restraint (conscious asides), anticipation. You can handle conflicts without distorting your perception of reality. Strongly correlated with success in life, health, and quality of relationships.

Vaillant's 75-year data reveals two propositions. Firstly,People who use more mature defenses have better objective life outcomes.. Second,Defense maturity can hardly be predicted by intelligence, education, or social class. ---Maturity is another level of development.

The implications in the context of overconfidence are twofold. One isDenial, projection, rationalization, intellectualization, and suppression -- the five defenses that support overconfidence listed in Section 5 all belong to the neurotic or immature class.. Therefore, the way to reduce overconfidence is to replace it with humor, restraint (conscious deferral), and anticipation. The other isMaturity develops with time and practice. Vaillan's data showed that some people's defense maturity increases after middle age -- training to recognize overconfidence can literally Adult developmental issues is.

08Klein's projective identification - overconfidence is amplified in relationships

defense mechanism phenomenon within the individual Freud and A. Freud's discussion, which is treated asphenomena that occur in relationships British child psychoanalysts expanded the Melanie Klein is. She presented it in her 1946 paper "Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanisms". projective identification This concept is one of the central concepts of object relations theory, and is also used in modern group dynamics and organization theory.

"Projective identification is a process in which one not only projects parts of oneself that are not recognized onto another person, but also makes the other person embody those parts through unconscious pressure. Projection is not simply an internal operation of the mind, but has the function of changing the other person through a relationship." - Melanie Klein, ``Notes on the Disruptive Mechanism'' (1946) Purpose

Although it is a difficult concept, it is a powerful tool for understanding overconfidence within organizations. Let's expand on the specifics. Senior judge A is confident that ``this case is fine.'' In fact, there is a very slight anxiety within A. However, A is not aware of this anxiety, and during a conversation with junior judge B, he unknowingly expresses his anxiety to B (subtle messages such as ``Aren't you too anxious?''). B experiences the anxiety he receives as his own emotion and expresses his worry. A sees B's worry and becomes more and more certain of himself ("I'm calm, B worries too much").

This chain isStructures that amplify overconfidence in relationships is. A's confidence is supported by B's anxiety, and B's anxiety is supported by A's belief. Both parties complement each other's psychology, and what is an objectively wrong judgment is firmly maintained as a dynamic of the relationship.

Implications are critical to understanding organizational overconfidence.Individual overconfidence is structured as a relational dynamic within a group.. Seniors have confidence, juniors have concerns, and in the end, the senior's decision is accepted. If this division of roles becomes fixed, the entire group will continue to maintain overconfidence as an "invisible system." We return to this organizational dimension in Part 6, "Why We Can't Learn from Failure" and Part 7, "Between Overconfidence and Humility."

09At the pharmaceutical site -- the moment when the defense mechanism kicks in

Bringing abstract theory to the field. In my daily life as a materials examiner, I will identify four specific moments when the defense mechanism is activated. Please observe each of these in light of the five mechanisms listed in Section 5.

scene 1

Justification (rationalization) of past decisions

When past judgments are questioned in an audit or review, explanations such as "the situation was different then" or "information was limited" immediately come to mind. Sometimes the explanation is factually correct. But it comes to mind speed This shows the function of rationalization.

scene 2

Blaming other teams (projection)

When a mistake in judgment by one's own team is discovered, the blame is blamed on an external source, such as ``that client didn't give clear instructions'' or ``sales made a deadline.'' Project responsibilities within your team onto others.

scene 3

Escape to abstract discussion (intellectualization)

When asked to consider specific judgments, he says, ``Bias is a structural problem...'' and moves on to generalizations. Although the point is correct, it does not reach the point of considering the decision I have just made.

scene 4

Silence of dissent (suppression)

That moment when you felt uncomfortable with the judgment of your superiors or customers, but you didn't say it out loud. I forget that feeling of discomfort. When I look back on it later, I only have a vague memory of, ``Now that I think about it, I feel like I felt something at that time.'' A sense of discomfort that was pushed back from consciousness.

What these four scenes have in common is thatThe person is not aware that "I am currently using a defense mechanism." is. All are experienced as natural reactions. That's why when looking back later Outline of discomfort You will need to get into the habit of observing.

10How to observe defense mechanisms -- three questions

Since defense mechanisms are unconscious, they cannot be directly observed. But that trace can be observed. As part of our practice, we would like to propose three questions. This is not psychoanalytic self-inquiry, but an everyday etiquette that can be used in judgment situations.

question 1

“What am I being protected from now?”

Immediately after making a decision, ask yourself a question in a very short time. Isn't the desire to avoid the realization that ``I might be wrong'' influencing that judgment? I grasp, even vaguely, the outline of the feeling I want to protect.

Question 2

“Are there any factors that I am not aware of in the motivation for this decision?”

In addition to the consciously cited reasons – regulatory requirements, past experience, industry practices – are there other less obvious motives? Are there any hidden motives, such as ``wanting to agree with my superior'', ``wanting to get things done in a short time'', or ``wanting to avoid troublesome discussions''?

問い 3

“What is the possibility that I most avoid?”

Assuming that this decision is wrong, write down one possible outcome. The harder a result is to write down, the more likely it is that the defense mechanism is working more strongly. The difficulty of writing itself becomes a signal.

The principle common to all three questions isRather than looking directly at the unconscious, observe the "outline of discomfort" left by the unconscious. That's what it means. Although complete introspection is impossible, we can observe traces of defenses: too quick explanations, too much certainty, too much abstraction, and inexplicable silences. The habit of capturing these traces loosens the roots of overconfidence.

Conclusion

Overconfidence is not a phenomenon that occurs consciously, but rather an unconscious function to protect the ego - this was the central proposition of this episode. The topography of the mind shown by Freud's local theory and structural theory, the defense mechanisms systematized by Anna Freud, the maturity of defenses demonstrated by Vaillant's 75-year data, and the relational dimension shown by Klein's projective identification - five perspectives have pointed to the same place using different words.Overconfidence is a "successful state" of the ego's defense mechanism.. That's why knowledge alone won't erase it.

The practical outcome of this article is not to directly attack overconfidence, but to identify the defense mechanisms that operate under it one by one. The three questions posed in Section 10 are the starting point. Next time (part 4), we will discuss defense mechanisms. projection Another structure of overconfidence that is closely related to ``self-serving attribution bias,'' or The psychology of blaming outsiders ── will be dealt with. We will analyze how the universal human tendency to attribute success to one's own abilities and failure to external factors supports overconfidence.

Key Points ─ 3 things to take home
  1. Overconfidence does not occur on the surface of consciousness, but is a ``successful state'' of the ego's defense mechanism, as Freud described it. So knowledge alone won't erase it. Rather than a direct attack, we need direction that identifies the underlying defense mechanism.
  2. There are five main defense mechanisms that support overconfidence: denial, rationalization, projection, intellectualization, and repression. At the material review site, this manifests itself as justifying past decisions, blaming other teams, escaping into abstract discussions, and silencing objections.
  3. Vaillant's 75-year study demonstrated that the maturity of defense mechanisms strongly correlates with life outcomes. The transition from neurotic, immature defenses to mature defenses (humor, inhibition, anticipation) is a developmental task for adults.
Source/References
  1. Freud, Sigmund. Die TraumdeutungLeipzig and Vienna: Franz Deuticke, 1900. (Japanese translation: Yoshitaka Takahashi translation "Dream Interpretation" Shincho Bunko, 1969 / New translation: Kazunari Shingu translation "Dream Interpretation" Iwanami Shoten "Freud Complete Works" Vol. 4-5, 2007)
  2. Freud, Sigmund. "Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse." Gesammelte Werke, Band XI. London: Imago, 1916–1917. (Japanese translation: Introduction to Psychoanalysis, translated by Yoshitaka Takahashi and Kozo Shimosaka, Shincho Bunko, 1977)
  3. Freud, Sigmund. Das Ich und das Es.Leipzig, Vienna and Zurich: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, 1923.
  4. Freud, Anna. Das Ich und die Abwehrmechanismen. Vienna: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, 1936.
  5. Vaillant, George E. Adaptation to LifeBoston: Little, Brown and Company, 1977. (Japanese translation: The Psychology of Life Masters, translated by Kimihiro Yoneyama, Sakuhinsha, 2008)
  6. Vaillant, George E. The Wisdom of the Ego. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
  7. Vaillant, George E. Triumphs of Experience: The Men of the Harvard Grant StudyCambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2012. (Collection of the Harvard Study of Adult Development)
  8. Klein, Melanie. "Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanisms." International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 27, 1946, pp. 99–110. (Japanese translation: Rikihachiro Kano, Akiko Watanabe, and Nobuo Aida (translators), “Memorandum on the Divisive System,” Melanie Klein Collected Works 4, Seishin Shobo, 1985)
  9. Bion, Wilfred R. Experiences in Groups and Other PapersLondon: Tavistock, 1961. (Application of projective identification to group dynamics. Japanese translation: Fundamentals of Group Psychotherapy, translated by Tadashi Tsushima, Takagi Academic Publishing, 1973)
  10. Wegner, Daniel M. The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002. (A masterpiece of cognitive psychology that demonstrated that conscious will is nothing more than a result)
  11. Bargh, John A. & Chartrand, Tanya L. "The unbearable automaticity of being." American Psychologist 54 (7), 1999, pp. 462–479. (Review of research on automaticity of social behavior)
  12. Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and SlowNew York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. (Dual process theory. Japanese translation: Fast & Slow, translated by Akiko Murai, Hayakawa Shobo, 2012)