Companies are cashing in on AI productivity gains. Some bosses think workers deserve a cut
People leaders are questioning who should reap the rewards of AI-driven productivity gains.
Read the original →Every story in this issue with a short summary, so you can decide what to read before leaving the site. Summaries are written by AI (Claude) only from each publisher's own description and checked by Jev for anything not in that description. They are not full translations. Follow "Read the original" for the full story.
People leaders are questioning who should reap the rewards of AI-driven productivity gains.
Read the original →The article argues that AI, as it currently unfolds, is incompatible with a sustainable transformation of the economy, which arguably requires degrowth. It describes AI as the growth paradigm reborn, built on enclosed commons, powered by fossil energy and driven by a competitive logic that makes precaution structurally impossible. It states that limits to AI growth are not technophobia but the best chance for a liveable future for all.
Read the original →A debate is spreading among central banks over whether artificial intelligence could raise the neutral interest rate, the theoretical real rate that the description defines only in part.
Read the original →The tracker lists all layoffs that the company or press attributed to AI. These include cuts made to fund AI investment, replace humans with AI, or respond to AI-driven market disruption. It shows AI job cuts over time by employees and layoff events for 2024, 2025 and 2026.
Read the original →The five-year initiative will advance Vision 2030 and strengthen student success.
Read the original →The description identifies the official as the United States Under Secretary of War for Research and Engineering and a member of US President Donald Trump's administration. No further details are given.
Read the original →